0 com

Why We Need More Anthony Weiners in the Democratic Party


Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) is one of the most passionate and over-the-top orators in Congress. Wednesday in the House, Weiner fervently declared that "every single Republican [he] had ever met in [his] life is a wholly owned subsidiary of the insurance industry." Although many may disagree with Rep. Weiner's statements, they certainly have an impact.
One of the Democrat's most fundamental issues is their inability to convey their views and opinions to voters. Often, Democrats are completely unable to get the American public to be aware of the issues important to the Democratic party and are just as unable to explain to their constituants what Republicans are doing wrong. Expressing party opinion is something Republicans excel at, as they know how to make noise about any issue and how to garner public attention.
In many cases, Democrats keep emotion out of their rhetoric and, therefore, make their message unreachable by American voters. The Democratic members of Congress need to allow their speeches to become more emotional if they want their platform to stay relevant to the American public.
If more Democrats begin to speak as Weiner or his colleague Barney Frank, who compared an angry constituant to a dining room table last year, do, they will have a greater change of staying competitive in the national debate with Republicans. It may not be the nicest or cleanest way to get your point across, but in this political climate, where cutting through all the other noise is paramount, it could be the most effective.
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/26/10

Johnny Weir 
"There’s a whole generation of people that aren’t defined by their sex or their race or by who they like to sleep with. I think as a person you know what your values are and what you believe in, and I think that’s the most important thing."
Read more »
0 com

Don't Ask, Don't Tell


It is so basically against the American political ideals of honesty and transparency to ask someone who devotes their life to serving our country to lie about who they are from the day they begin to serve. Not only is it morally wrong to force a soldier to lie, even as they take on an oath swearing honesty, but it is detrimental to the armed forces to limit who can serve to people who fit the extraordinarily limited ‘traditional’ definition of who should serve be allowed in the military.

Lt. Dan Choi, who is fluent in Arabic, was discharged from the military for being gay after an appearance on The Rachel Maddow Show where he came out. The skills and experience Choi brought to the armed forces were vital, and without loyal, patriotic, and talented people like Choi, our military will crumble.
The Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy made some sense in the early nineties, when the social climate in America was decisively anti-homosexual, and the military is, in general, more conservative in its policies than mainstream America. However, although it may not be true for everyone, America is becoming more tolerant and accepting. It is time to change an old policy that weakens our military, divides our troops, and causes our soldiers to lie.
Regardless of how you feel about gay rights, it is not good for the military to lose qualified service members because of social differences. 
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/23/10

Martin Luther King Jr.      
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
Read more »
0 com

What's Wrong With Congress Today: Part Four: Bipartisanship


Even as President Obama unveils a new bipartisan economic council, even as Congressional leaders prepare for the two-party health care summit, bipartisanship- or lack thereof- is a serious concern of many members of Congress. The Republicans say they are ignored in the legislative process. Democrats retaliate, saying Republicans offer no solutions- a "party of no". Neither party seems willing to compromise at the same time. One party gives up an ideal as a concession, but the other offers no votes. One offers a plan, while the other ignores the ideas.
American government has no future if it is not a bipartisan one. However, in order for bipartisan compromise to happen, both parties must be willing to work together, and both must be willing to leave with a little less than they wanted. Bipartisanship is not something that can happen because one party offers it, nor is it something that can happen because another party demands it. As Democrats and Republicans test their already tenuous relationship with new demands but no concessions, it seems as though bipartisanship has no future in America.
For a long time, until the seating of Senator Scott Brown, the Democratic caucus could have acted completely in a partisan manner and ignored the opinions and viewpoints of the Republican caucus. However, Democrats did include many key Republican demands in both pieces of major legislation: the stimulus bill and the health care reform bill. Neither bill, however, received a single Republican vote in the Senate. Democrats also minimized their ideals, keeping the public option out of the Senate health care bill and keeping the stimulus package as a tax-cut heavy, infrastructure spending light bill.
Still, not only Republicans are to blame for the complete void of bipartisanship in the Senate. Democrats, at times, have been all too willing to move forward without Republican support.
Although it is the responsibility of both parties to work towards bipartisanship, considering the current climate in the Senate, it is appropriate for the Democratic caucus to move forward with reconciliation if the Republican Party doesn’t not express willingness to work in a bipartisan manner at the health care summit.
Read more »
0 com

What's Wrong With Congress Today: Part Three: Misinformation

Part of what makes Congress so important as a national lawmaking body is the honest and passionate debate that takes place on Capitol Hill over views, policy, and political philosophy. It is these disagreements, these inconsistencies, that make America the nation that it is, full of differing and unique opinions, and debate like this is paramount to the success of our country. However, it is impossible for these discussions to take place if the members of Congress and American voters do not agree upon the basic facts behind any one issue.
You can't argue with someone if you and they are not arguing from the same set of facts. And yet, that seems to be exactly what is happening in Congress. To some, the stimulus bill provided thousands of jobs, while others insist that not a single job was created or saved. When talking to press or to constituants, some congressmen say that President Obama raised taxes, but Obama and the Democrats say that, for 95% of Americans, taxes were cut.
If constituants do not receive consistant and truthful information from their Congressional representation, there is no way that Americans will be able to elect congressmen on the merits of their opinions.  As each party pushes its own set of facts forward, honest debate in America begins to die. It is the responsibility of elected officials to provide and the responsibility of Americans to demand honesty, for, without it, Congress will no longer be able to create meaningful and useful legislation that grows from honest discourse.

Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/22/10

President Barack Obama          
"As a nuclear power - as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon - the United States has a moral responsibility to act. "
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/19/10

Barbara Boxer        
"Every citizen of this country should be guaranteed that their vote matters, that their vote is counted, and that in the voting booth, their vote has a much weight as that of any CEO, any member of Congress, or any President."
Read more »
0 com

Gay Rights in Africa

Photo from NYTimes.com      
The New York Times reported Sunday that a homosexual couple in Malawi had been arrested for, quite simply, ‘being gay,’ which is illegal in the African nation. The couple, both men, although one is transgender, had recently been engaged and featured in a newspaper; whose report is presumably what raised concerns in the Malawi government. Officials in Malawi decried homosexuality as “immoral” and blamed ‘the west’ for bringing it to their nation. This particular arrest, along with a few other pubic instances of gay activism that were strictly handled, has set Malawi against the modernized community, but Malawi is just becoming more anti-homosexual.
Homosexuals, and transgenders in particular, have always been targets of violence, legal discrimination, and political discrimination- during the Holocaust, for instance, homosexuals were one group persecuted by the Nazis, along with the Jewish community and gypsies, among others. In many countries, they are treated as second-class citizens- or not even seen as citizens at all. In Uganda, as the article points out, homosexuality may soon be punishable by death.
A nation can no more illegalize ‘being gay’ than they can ‘being black’ or ‘being tall’. Until Malawi and other countries around the world realize this, many people will have to live in secret and lie about who they are, keeping gay rights from being an issue in the national conversation, and, therefore, leaving the law unchanged.
The arrest of the young couple brought to light a serious issue of discrimination in a place where issues like these are rarely, if ever confronted. Adding the atrocity of this legal prejudice to the national conversation may give Malawi a chance to change their policies and, eventually, change the national disposition towards issues of gay rights. If nations like Malawi ever hope to be considered a part of the modern community, their governments must be able to legislatively and personally let go of old prejudices and allow all people to have equal rights. 
The US still has a long way to go before it can be claimed that everyone has equal rights under the law, but with the first legal challenge to California’s controversial Proposition 8 underway and top military leaders calling for a change in the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy, America is headed in the right direction. 
Read more »
0 com

What's Wrong With Congress Today: Part Two: The Filibuster

In the Senate, there is a rule that allows one person to block the passage of legislation indefinitely unless that piece of legislation has at least 60 votes- nine more than are usually required to pass a bill. The filibuster was originally used sparingly, with a motion for cloture being filed only twice, for instance, between 1949 and 1950, and only once between 1959 and 1960. However, cloture has been filed a record-breaking 214 times since 2007, and this is hardly part of a gradual trend- cloture was only filed 68 times during the previous session.
The filibuster was intended to protect the minority party and their constituants from idealistic passage of legislation by the majority party, but is instead being used today to block any bills from being passed. Since neither party currently holds a 60-seat majority in the Senate, legislation that is filibustered by the minority party is virtually not passable.  
The inextricable uptick in filibusters since 2007 does not look as though it will be reversed. If the minority party continues to fight all legislation by simple blockage and not though bipartisanship, the 'nuclear option' will have to be exercised and the filibuster removed as a tool in the Senate.
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/17/10

Sandra Day O'Connor
"Do the best you can in every task, no matter how unimportant it may seem at the time. No one learns more about a problem than the person at the bottom."
Read more »
0 com

What's Wrong With Congress Today: Part One: Lack of Voting/Action Consistency

Sunday on Meet the Press, Rachel Maddow of MSNBC and Representative Aaron Schock (R-Il) confronted over comments made by Maddow saying Schock had voted against the Obama stimulus bill and yet had shown up for an event in his district for a stimulus-funded project, and had, quite literally, held up the giant stimulus check. Similarly, many moderate Democratic and Republican congressmen have been vocally supportive of health care reform and positive about its implications while talking to constituants but did not provide the votes to back up their sentiments.

You see this sort of voting hypocrisy rampantly in Washington- no one wants to take the risk of voting for a politically charged bill, especially when the bill is against their party norm, but everyone wants to reap the benefits for constituants. It is the responsibility of elected officials to stand by their votes, decisions, and opinions. If a congressman in against the bill while the vote is taken, he or she should not be able to be applauded by voters for its benefits. By acting as though he or she is in favor of the bill, their constituency is being misled.


Without support for beneficial but contentious bills that may be against the ideals of one of the parties, and with the current Senate filibuster rules, no politically risky legislation will be able to be passed by Congress. Congressmen who wish to benefit politically from bills have to vote for them.
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/16/10


President Barack Obama
"Today we know what is right, and today we know what is wrong. The slaughter of innocents is wrong. Two million people driven from their homes is wrong. Women gang raped while gathering firewood is wrong. And silence, acquiescence and paralysis in the face of genocide is wrong."
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/15/10

Rachel Maddow 
"We don't really treat gay issues differently than other issues ... I can't do the show as a non-gay person. I don't have that option."
Read more »
1 com

Quote 2/10/10

Robert Gibbs
"The best way to fight rumor is with fact. If you don't fight rumor, it becomes truth."

Read more »
0 com

Health Care Update

Pres. Obama said during a Super Bowl pregame interview he plans to have a health care summit with lawmakers. Is Obama finally taking an active role in reform?
Read more »
0 com

Friday Feature: American Idol and the American Dream

I live in the 'reality TV generation'. For my peers, growing up to be on a MTV reality show like 'The Hills' or auditioning- and making it on- American Idol, is a legitimate hope for the future. Forget the 'American dream', that age-old idea that, in America, if you work hard, you can make it. The insta-celebrity derived from the reality TV circuit neutralizes the work factor.  


Perhaps the winners of 'So You Think You Can Dance' or 'Project Runway' who enjoy instant fame deserve it- they work hard and are very talented, but it's hard to make the same case for the 'Octomom' or Heidi Montag. These pseudo-celebrities teach fame hungry youths that, in order to make your fame and fortune, all you have to do is cause controversy. 


The legally-questionable choices some of the cable-manufactured stars make reveal to impressionable students that the only consequence of moral bankruptcy is notoriety. The normalization of underage drinking, drug use, and domestic violence by well-known and generally respected celebrities leads to similar trends in young people. In a world where being controversial on TV can win you fame, fortune, and future television prospects, these behaviors become mainstream. 
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/5/10

Janet Napolitano 
"If American schooling is inadequate now, just imagine how much more obsolete it will be when today's kindergarten students graduate from high school in just 12 years." 
Read more »
0 com

Art Cuts on a Local Level

By senior correspondent Devon Maloney

Superintendent Jack Dale has proposed everything from class size increases to ending the purchases of new buses to solve Fairfax County Public Schools’ (FCPS) sweeping budget problem. The total proposed cuts would save the county a total of about $114 million. One of these cuts eliminates the elementary band and strings program; a move which would save the county an estimated seven million dollars.
Orchestra director Catherine Prosser is fighting to save the elementary music programs, as she feels that students will not learn to play instruments without these programs.
"Most students begin playing an instrument in elementary school, if they play at all," Prosser said. "You have a small handful that starts at a young age, but the majority begins their instruction in elementary school."
Orchestra members are also against the cut.
"This cut would severely affect the entire orchestra program-starting at the middle school orchestra, then eventually the high school and college orchestras," senior Camille Lorenzana, a violinist in advanced orchestra, said. "I know it’s only affecting fourth, fifth and sixth graders, [but over time] it will really affect the whole chain of musicians."

Without the opportunity to start playing in a band or orchestra until middle school, Prosser worries that taking up an instrument in middle school will not bring in as many students as it does currently in elementary school as music is "just not going to have the same appeal."
Looking at other school districts that have made similar cuts, Prosser said, 65% percent of students that would have otherwise joined the band or orchestra are lost to other activities.
Although the cuts would not immediately affect Marshall’s music program, the band and orchestra predict to see decreased participation if the cut is implemented, Prosser said.
The orchestra currently has about 60 members. Considering the 65% decrease reported by other school districts, the orchestra program would be left with around 21 musicians.
"We would have to go down to one orchestra class, and that would be devastating," Prosser said.
But Prosser hopes that community outcry can save the elementary school programs.
"We encourage students to get involved [in the protests]," Prosser said. "There are many different meetings and things going on in the area [to get involved in the discussion]. I give the parents the information and hope that they encourage [their kids] to get involved."

Prosser is also one of the teacher sponsors of Marshall’s music honor society, Tri-M, which has gotten very involved in protesting the proposed elementary band and orchestra elimination by going to rallies.
"We’ve gotten involved with this by wearing our music t-shirts and bringing signs, rallying outside the buildings where the county’s board meetings occur," senior Yura Kim, the Tri-M president, said. "We’ve also emailed and called their hotlines to let them know that this budget cut would be a huge mistake."
The most recent protests include last night’s rally at Luther Jackson Middle School in Falls Church. There will also be protests held tonight and tomorrow night also at Jackson at six and five o’clock, respectively.
Despite the possibility of multiple cuts, Dale hopes to maintain the FCPS music program’s "high student achievement and excellence."
Kilmer Middle School’s assistant band director, Emily Morgan, agrees that FCPS has "long been regarded nationally as a leader in music education, preparing students to attend the most prestigious music school and conservatories in the world."
However, Morgan points out that the potential cuts would "destroy [the] county’s reputation and caliber of [its] middle and high school ensembles."
Read more »
0 com

Regulation

During last Wednesday's State of the Union Address, President Obama discussed plans to fine banks, which had, after accepting stimulus funds, awarded sizable bonuses to employees and not fully repaid the American taxpayer. Unfortunately, this minimal planned restriction does nothing to override the sweeping deregulation in the nineties that contributed to the 2008 financial breakdown.
This deregulation was most notably caused by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which allowed commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms and insurance companies to combine, making them practically not able to be regulated by the US government. The act also left combination banks free to loan their investment sides money to spend on other endeavors and with the ability to insure themselves- so that if they were ever in need of insurance, they would actually be unable to provide it.
During the hight of the US financial crisis, when the banks were being bailed out, many politicians talked about the banks being 'too big to fail'. The size of the bailed out banks was due to their consolidation with other companies- like Citigroup, which used to just be Citibank- which, in turn, was due to the passage of Gramm-Leach-Bliley. And yet, over ten years and a financial meltdown after it's passage, Gramm-Leach-Bliley is still an applicable piece of legislation.
As President Obama makes compromise after compromise with the still unsupportive Republicans, he cannot allow financial regulation and reform to wait any longer, if he wishes to prevent another banking crash that must be paid for by taxpayers. He can start by asking Congress to retract Gramm-Leach-Bliley.
Read more »
0 com

Quote 2/2/10

Michelle Obama 
" Before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation." 
Read more »
The Liberal Hype site claims no credit for any images featured on this site unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners. Liberal Hype is in no way responsible for, or has control of, the content of any external website links or embedded streaming videos. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies. If you own rights to any of the content and wish to have it removed please contact at liberalhype@gmail.com. My Tangled Tale, Vinyl, The Dull Drama, First Draft Magician, and other partners are produced by respective owners, and Liberal Hype claims no connection to any information they publish.